To the general outlawry of the policy of resorting to war to resolve disputes in international relations.To the legal institution of war, in which war, as a legal condition, was regulated as an acknowledged element of international society.From the Just War doctrine, in which the resort to force was largely framed in terms of vindicating natural-law rights.Some key parts of that history, in the form of an extremely general outline, included the following shifts (in chronological order, from old to new): In contemporary terms, those concepts variously implicated the jus ad bellum, IHL, or both of those fields (in addition to others). Over many centuries, the international-legal concept of war between two or more states as well as related concepts-such as neutrality, measures short of war, and reprisals-underwent significant changes. Each of these concepts may entail different implications with respect to discerning when the relevant conflict has ceased and when (a portion of) IHL no longer applies in relation to it. Today, three types of armed conflicts between two or more states may be relevant: a state of war in the legal sense, an international armed conflict, or a belligerent occupation. Painting the boundaries, if only in broad-brush strokes, of that concept is important here because it is not possible to determine when an IAC ends, under current IHL, without establishing the scope of the relevant conflict. The history of the contemporary international-legal concept of international armed conflicts spans many centuries. Finally, a table summarizes relevant IHL-of-IAC treaty provisions and a few salient formulations drawn from international bodies.Ĭoncept of International Armed Conflict And we briefly highlight the most-cited general formulation by a judicial body on what marks the end of IAC. The bulk of the section identifies, in outline form, IHL treaty provisions concerning the end of IACs and the cessation of application of IHL in relation to those conflicts. We discuss some salient issues concerning agreements between the parties, such as cease-fires and peace treaties. (Section 5 addresses non-international armed conflicts.) To lay the groundwork, we first sketch the international-legal concept of IACs. This section outlines IHL provisions concerning the end of international armed conflicts (IACs) and the cessation of (a portion of) IHL in relation to those conflicts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |